What Was Supposed to Be COSTLY
Since yesterday, Ireland has looked like the decisive element of this Vendée Arctique. To head south, the leaders had to make a choice. On one side lay the demanding passages through the North Channel and St George’s Channel. On the other, a wide detour around the western side of Ireland. Two interpretations of the same race. Two different approaches to risk. For those who chose the second option, the objective was not necessarily to gain miles but rather to avoid a notoriously difficult sequence involving coastal effects, tidal currents, shipping traffic and numerous navigational traps. A prudent decision more than an aggressive gamble. On paper, the verdict seemed obvious. The detour looked a little like taking country roads on a holiday journey: more distance and, theoretically, lost time at the finish. Then the weather models began telling a different story. With each successive forecast update, that option has regained credibility. Without necessarily becoming the winning route, it may ultimately prove far less costly than initially expected. The reason lies in an increasingly uncertain endgame. Between Brittany and Vendée, the extensive light-wind zone expected in the coming days could compress the fleet and offer a second opportunity to those who willingly surrendered ground earlier in the race. Currently slowed by a ridge of high pressure off pictureque Dingle Bay, Ambrogio Beccaria remains cautious.